Re: Requiring LLVM 14+ in PostgreSQL 18 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Requiring LLVM 14+ in PostgreSQL 18
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLXr0Rjz_6PQrNWe7Z-k7_G-MAHoh1DP+A-sxw0qpYEDQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [MASSMAIL]Requiring LLVM 14+ in PostgreSQL 18  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Requiring LLVM 14+ in PostgreSQL 18
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 1:38 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> Therefore, some time after the tree re-opens for hacking, we could rip
> out a bunch of support code for LLVM 10-13, and then rip out support
> for pre-opaque-pointer mode.  Please see attached.

... or of course closer to the end of the cycle if that's what people
prefer for some reason, I don't mind too much as long as it happens.

I added this to the commitfest app, and it promptly failed for cfbot.
That's expected: CI is still using Debian 11 "bullseye", which only
has LLVM 11.  It became what Debian calls "oldstable" last year, and
reaches the end of oldstable in a couple of months from now.  Debian
12 "bookworm" is the current stable release, and it has LLVM 14, so we
should probably go and update those CI images...



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR
Next
From: Tender Wang
Date:
Subject: Re: Can't find not null constraint, but \d+ shows that