Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLVbeh87VrXvR4fo9nDOfxY7sk5Cv6=Lbds6bPmCnP1Tw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:07 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I'm also wondering a bit why the issue isn't affecting the newer
> branches.  It's certainly not because we made the test shorter ...

I looked at htop while it was building the 9.x branches and saw
pg_basebackup sitting in D state waiting for glacial I/O.  Perhaps
this was improved by the --no-sync option that got sprinkled around
the place in later releases?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements oddity with track = all
Next
From: Ajin Cherian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions