Re: A test for replay of regression tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLV3wzmYFbNs+TZ1+w0e=hc61fcvrF3OmutuaPBuZMd0w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A test for replay of regression tests  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: A test for replay of regression tests
List pgsql-hackers
cfbot found another source of nondeterminism in the regression tests,
due to the smaller shared_buffers used in this TAP test:

https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4611828654276608
https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/4611828654276608/log/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/regression.diffs

Turned out that we had already diagnosed that once before, when tiny
build farm animal chipmunk reported the same, but we didn't commit a
fix:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKGLTK6ZuEkpeJ05-MEmvmgZveCh%2B_w013m7%2ByKWFSmRcDA%40mail.gmail.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Japin Li
Date:
Subject: Fix pg_waldump documentation about block option
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Document atthasmissing default optimization avoids verification table scan