Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Decoupling our alignment assumptions about int64 and double - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Decoupling our alignment assumptions about int64 and double
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLSOnqKLPKv2N_Xne162Sqs_kyoUjGcx+mkNDeWbg-vyw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Decoupling our alignment assumptions about int64 and double  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Decoupling our alignment assumptions about int64 and double
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
> But now that we've agreed to toss xlc support
> out the window,

We weren't the only ones, apparently...  I don't know the details but
it would be surprising if this stuff doesn't work on this tool chain:

https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/openxl-c-and-cpp-aix/17.1.4?topic=new-enhanced-llvm-clang-support

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: PGPROC alignment (was Re: pgsql: Separate RecoveryConflictReasons from procsignals)
Next
From: Viktor Holmberg
Date:
Subject: Re: ON CONFLICT DO SELECT (take 3)