Re: Non-reproducible AIO failure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Non-reproducible AIO failure
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLSNaMAgSBtjJiCnbyHBoH05Xb60jOOaXwsAQQqrYS=MA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Non-reproducible AIO failure  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 12:37 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I'm a bit confused by this focus on bitfields - both Alexander and Konstantin
> stated they could reproduce the issue without the bitfields.

Konstantin's message all seem to say it *did* fix it?

But I do apologise for working through the same theory and analysis as
Konstantin had already done earlier.  I somehow had the impression
this topic was considered closed, and was reacting to Alexander's
latest email as if it was a new variant of the problem when I wrote
that.  ETHREADTOOLONG.

> But we have observed the generated code being pretty grotty and it's caused
> more than enough confusion - so let's just replace them with plain uint8's and
> cast in switches.

+1



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] no table rewrite when set column type to constrained domain
Next
From: Alexandra Wang
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support