On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 2:41 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> > With default compiler /usr/bin/gcc-4.2 (powerpc-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.2.1
> > (GCC) 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5577)) the error is:
> > pg_collation.c:55: error: conflicting types for ‘CollationCreate’
>
> PG 12 is EOL, so we won't be doing anything about this. However,
> it's evident from your messages that the problem is something
> about "bool" (probably our typedef as "char") versus "_Bool"
> (C99 <stdbool.h>). If you need a fix for PG 12, you might get
> somewhere by trawling later branches' commit history for fixes
> related to that.
We didn't resolve that in a way that would work for (old) macOS/PPC,
where sizeof(_Bool) was 4 (it was the last known system to have a size
other than 1). But if you want a hackish solution for archeological
purposes, let's see...
REL_12_STABLE's c.h says:
#if defined(HAVE_STDBOOL_H) && SIZEOF_BOOL == 1
#include <stdbool.h>
#define USE_STDBOOL 1
#else
#ifndef bool
typedef unsigned char bool; <-- macOS/PPC would do this, not the thing above
#endif
I assume that <stdbool.h> is being included indirectly later by some
other system header, and that's defining bool to _Bool and thus hiding
our typedef. I don't know what changed since we used to test on that
platform a few years ago, but perhaps you could try messing with
<stdbool.h>'s include guard by defining __STDBOOL_H? Or something
along those lines, either with -D or in c.h.
Obviously it's not great that some libraries would use a different
size for "bool". We don't do that any more, in recent releases.
