Re: On disable_cost - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: On disable_cost
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKuXZjCtfP7o1FcEMKFy051GmkQJG3O3tPTTi645ehR8A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: On disable_cost  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: On disable_cost  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 7:24 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
> Doesn't that rely on a specific implementation of double precision (IEEE)?
> I thought that we don't want to limit ourselves to platforms with IEEE floats.

Just by the way, you might want to read the second last paragraph of
the commit message for 02ddd499.  The dream is over, we're never going
to run on Vax.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: shared tempfile was not removed on statement_timeout (unreproducible)
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: error context for vacuum to include block number