Re: [HACKERS] kqueue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] kqueue
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKopkE51cV0XiMLWDnaLK5ELS8pJ1OG2dU=7q0AzPWmJg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] kqueue  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:54 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> If there are no further objections, I'm planning to commit this sooner
> rather than later, so that it gets plenty of air time on developer and
> build farm machines.  If problems are discovered on a particular
> platform, there's a pretty good escape hatch: you can define
> WAIT_USE_POLL, and if it turns out to be necessary, we could always do
> something in src/template similar to what we do for semaphores.

I updated the error messages to match the new "unified" style, adjust
a couple of comments, and pushed.  Thanks to all the people who
tested.  I'll keep an eye on the build farm.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: Portal->commandTag as an enum