Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKmGm6nT2_d=_MeqJe81tkNgzy_suXQc=GFdHuQt+XecA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 6:58 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> ... Perhaps something like 0004, which also shows the sort
> of thing that we might consider back-patching to 14 and 15 (next
> revision I'll move that up the front and put it in back-patchable
> form).

I think this is the minimal back-patchable change.  I propose to go
ahead and do that, and then to kick the ideas about latch API changes
into a new thread for the next commitfest.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Regina Obe"
Date:
Subject: RE: Ability to reference other extensions by schema in extension scripts
Next
From: Runqi Tian
Date:
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs