Re: cfbot vs. changes in the set of CI tasks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: cfbot vs. changes in the set of CI tasks
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKdOS9qqK3ox8+brNMX26qONcZX5SW5QjiCrzOfy+Urbw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: cfbot vs. changes in the set of CI tasks  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: cfbot vs. changes in the set of CI tasks
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:17 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 9:44 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > I was confused about how come the new patches I'd just posted in
> > the 3848 CF item (write/read support for raw parse trees) are
> > showing a mix of passes and fails in the cfbot.  I eventually
> > realized that the fail results are all old and stale, because
> > (for example) there's no longer a "FreeBSD - 13" task to run,
> > just "FreeBSD - 13 - Meson".  This seems tremendously confusing.
> > Can we get the cfbot to not display no-longer-applicable results?
> >
> > As a quick-fix hack it might do to just flush all the pre-meson-commit
> > results, but I doubt this'll be the last time we make such changes.
> > I think an actual filter comparing the result's time to the time of the
> > allegedly-being-tested patch would be prudent.
>
> Ah, right.  Morning here and I've just spotted that too after the
> first results of the Meson era rolled in overnight.  It shows the
> latest result for each distinct task name, which now includes extinct
> tasks (until they eventually get garbage collected due to age in a few
> days).  I clearly didn't anticipate tasks going away.  Perhaps I
> should figure out how to show only results corresponding to a single
> commit ID... looking into that...

Done, and looking more sane now.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v13
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: cfbot vs. changes in the set of CI tasks