Re: "pg_ctl: the PID file ... is empty" at end of make check - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: "pg_ctl: the PID file ... is empty" at end of make check
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKb=_pN-XNF99TKPGCq5ibkka900guXgSNr2fM7EPzrWg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "pg_ctl: the PID file ... is empty" at end of make check  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: "pg_ctl: the PID file ... is empty" at end of make check
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 2:26 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 1:21 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 1:55 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > >> and now prairiedog has shown it too:
> > >> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prairiedog&dt=2019-10-14%2021%3A45%3A47
> > >> which is positively fascinating, because prairiedog is running a
> > >> bronze-age version of macOS that surely never heard of APFS.
> > >> So this makes it look like this is a basic macOS bug that's not
> > >> as filesystem-dependent as one might think.
> >
> > > Does https://github.com/macdice/unlinktest show the problem on that system?
> >
> > It does, though with a very low frequency:
> >
> > $ ./unlinktest
> > $ ./unlinktest 10000
> > read 0 bytes, unexpected
> > $ ./unlinktest 10000
> > read 0 bytes, unexpected
> > read 0 bytes, unexpected
> > $ ./unlinktest 10000
> > $
> >
> > The failure rate on my recent-vintage laptop is more like one
> > failure every five loops.
>
> Wow.  Ok, I'll add a note to the bug report to say it's reproducible
> on "Darwin Kernel Version 8.11.0: Wed Oct 10 18:26:00 PDT 2007;
> root:xnu-792.24.17~1/RELEASE_PPC" next time I'm near an Apple device
> that will let me log into the bug thing.  On the off-chance that
> someone from Apple stumbles on this and is interested, the Radar
> number is rdar://46318934 and the title is "unlink(2) is not atomic
> (kernel/file system bug)".

My bug report got an automated-looking message telling me to retest in
Big Sur beta 6 back in September, and I've just now upgraded an old
x86 Mac to Big Sur 11.01 and I can no longer reproduce the problem, so
it looks like it was fixed!  Thanks, Apple.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Misc typos
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: "pg_ctl: the PID file ... is empty" at end of make check