Re: Regression failures after changing PostgreSQL blocksize - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Regression failures after changing PostgreSQL blocksize
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKZYejB9uo2OivL3FWeZUGrp7RAVqioYCcw2t+zRLrpTA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Regression failures after changing PostgreSQL blocksize  (Yasir <yasir.hussain.shah@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Regression failures after changing PostgreSQL blocksize
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 7:19 AM Yasir <yasir.hussain.shah@gmail.com> wrote:
> I recently configured PostgreSQL with a custom blocksize:
>
> ./configure --with-blocksize=32
> make && make check
> OR
> make && make check-world
>
> This produced so many regression failures. I'm wondering, are such failures typical/expected when altering the
defaultblock size? 
> I came across a related discussion, but it dates back more than a decade. It would be great to get current
perspectives.

Yes, that is known.  I suspect there won't be wide interest in custom
block sizes until/unless we can change them at run time (as is
occasionally proposed, since there are known benefits to using smaller
blocks for OLTP and larger blocks for OLAP), and if that ever happens
I guess those regression tests will probably still need to run with
the traditional size.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexandre Felipe
Date:
Subject: SLOPE - Planner optimizations on monotonic expressions.
Next
From: "Matheus Alcantara"
Date:
Subject: Re: Add CREATE SCHEMA ... LIKE support