Re: check_strxfrm_bug() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: check_strxfrm_bug()
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKWH6f6fAKzbcb9KfMYPEVUaCNvWOcabdoCZSaA0_Z7ww@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: check_strxfrm_bug()  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: check_strxfrm_bug()
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 4:25 AM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 01:02:21PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:03 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The GCC build farm has just received some SPARC hardware new enough to
> > > run modern Solaris (hostname gcc106), so if wrasse were moved over
> > > there we could finally assume all systems have POSIX 2008 (AKA
> > > SUSv4)'s locale_t.
> >
> > That would look something like this.
>
> This removes thirty-eight ifdefs, most of them located in the middle of
> function bodies.  That's far more beneficial than most proposals to raise
> minimum requirements.  +1 for revoking support for wrasse's OS version.
> (wrasse wouldn't move, but it would stop testing v17+.)

Great.  It sounds like I should wait a few days for any other feedback
and then push this patch.  Thanks for looking.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Skip collecting decoded changes of already-aborted transactions
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: ProcessStartupPacket(): database_name and user_name truncation