Re: BTMaxItemSize seems to be subtly incorrect - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: BTMaxItemSize seems to be subtly incorrect
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKP7jm7_YB68Op_1Mkk10MBDAC0sW3xJE4w2515OYz4Zw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BTMaxItemSize seems to be subtly incorrect  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: BTMaxItemSize seems to be subtly incorrect
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 3:56 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:20 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think I'd feel more comfortable if you wrote the patch, if that's possible.
>
> Okay, pushed a fix just now.

FYI florican and lapwing showed:

2022-08-05 01:04:29.903 EDT [34485:5] FATAL:  deduplication failed to
add heap tid to pending posting list
2022-08-05 01:04:29.903 EDT [34485:6] CONTEXT:  WAL redo at 0/49708D8
for Btree/DEDUP: nintervals 4; blkref #0: rel 1663/16384/2674, blk 1



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: BTMaxItemSize seems to be subtly incorrect