On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 6:52 PM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> Not just to throw a wrench in there, but... Should this perhaps be a tablespace option? ISTM having different
filesystemsfor them is a good reason to use tablespaces in the first place, and then being able to pick different
options...
We discussed that a bit earlier in the thread. Some problems about
layering violations and general weirdness, I recall trying it even.
On the flip side, is it right to declare very local
filesystem-specific choices in a system catalogue that is replicated
and affects replicas?
What about a fancier GUC that can reference tablespaces?
