Re: Is RecoveryConflictInterrupt() entirely safe in a signal handler? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Is RecoveryConflictInterrupt() entirely safe in a signal handler?
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKEtbF1t9N_e_K2UiY+HGjGtKausm44oajinJHoMcfjYA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is RecoveryConflictInterrupt() entirely safe in a signal handler?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 1:39 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is a rebase over 26669757, which introduced
> PROCSIG_RECOVERY_CONFLICT_LOGICALSLOT.

Oops, please disregard v7 (somehow lost a precious line of code).  V8 is better.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: A failure in 031_recovery_conflict.pl on Debian/s390x
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench: allow to exit immediately when any client is aborted