Re: A test for replay of regression tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGKDsx=kpVqj_s5QcYgGtrNqci75e5cp-C4b8z52VoEaPQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A test for replay of regression tests  (Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: A test for replay of regression tests
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 3:30 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 12:10:23PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > This adds 2 whole minutes to the recovery check, when running with the
> > Windows serial-only scripts on Cirrus CI (using Andres's CI patches).
> > For Linux it adds ~20 seconds to the total of -j8 check-world.
> > Hopefully that's time well spent, because it adds test coverage for
> > all the redo routines, and hopefully soon we won't have to run 'em in
> > series on Windows.
>
> Should 027-stream-regress be renamed to something that starts earlier ?
> Off-list earlier this year, Andres referred to 000.

Do you have any data on improved times from doing that?

I have wondered about moving it into 001_stream_rep.pl.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Support custom authentication methods using hooks
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Checking pgwin32_is_junction() errors