Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGK6ULHPnUPu=f5_FUkv8dkjgZ3=S-XYB-P8O=DLr3T4VQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 12:15 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 8:01 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > So their gettext handles PRIu64 and PRIu32 and nothing else.
>
> Hah, I had predicted that three would work.  Off by one.
>
> > What to do now?  I could revert 8c498479d and followups, but
> > I sure don't want to.  A stopgap measure to make the farm look
> > green would be to add a variant expected-file that accepts
> > this output, but yech.  Thoughts?
>
> So close yet so far... I tried asking if it's easy to fix:
>
> https://github.com/sabotage-linux/gettext-tiny/issues/76

Problem ack'd.  It looks like they want to fix it.  Fingers crossed.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zsolt Parragi
Date:
Subject: Re: Custom oauth validator options
Next
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: Serverside SNI support in libpq