Re: A qsort template - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: A qsort template
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGK0w6sKNRPx4bgS_+DSY5LxKTZnDqxCL5PmEo3tKGySgw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A qsort template  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 1:20 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 1:14 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > The big problem in my mind, which would not be alleviated in the
> > slightest by having a separate file, is that it'd be easy to miss
> > removing entries if they ever become obsolete.
>
> I suppose you could invent some kind of declaration syntax in a
> comment near the use of the pseudo-typename in the source tree that is
> mechanically extracted.

What do you think about something like this?

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dipesh Pandit
Date:
Subject: Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Add proper planner support for ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates