Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGJgSn+JF929bMpxhn21p0ArUwjs_RrxGKb2_6Fuu5J09w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation  (Kyle Kingsbury <aphyr@jepsen.io>)
Responses Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation  (Kyle Kingsbury <aphyr@jepsen.io>)
Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation  (raf <raf@raf.org>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 3:14 PM Kyle Kingsbury <aphyr@jepsen.io> wrote:
> I wanted to let you know that I've put together a draft of a report on these
> findings, and if you've got any comments you'd like to offer, I'd be happy to
> hear them, either on-list or privately.
> http://jepsen.io/analyses/postgresql-12.3?draft-token=Kets1Quayfs

What do you think about this documentation update?

I'm not experienced with biblioentry academic references; if someone
would like to show me how this is supposed to be cited, I'm all ears.

Attachment

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation
Next
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #16490: We cannot able to access production database remotely