Re: Proposal: Removing 32 bit support starting from PG17++ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Proposal: Removing 32 bit support starting from PG17++
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGJaJHQHB7cRL+QPR50vPXFsPjWV4vyUUcqjr7m6Q0rV=g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: Removing 32 bit support starting from PG17++  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 12:34 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Dunno about antique MIPS.  I think there's still some interest in
> not-antique 32-bit MIPS; I have some current-production routers
> with such CPUs.  (Sadly, they don't have enough storage to do
> anything useful with, or I'd think about repurposing one for
> buildfarm.)

FWIW "development of the MIPS architecture has ceased"[1].  (Clearly
there are living ISAs that continue either its spirit or its ...
instructions, but they aren't calling themselves MIPS.)

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIPS_architecture



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready
Next
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 16 Beta 1 release announcement draft