Re: SQL-standard function body - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: SQL-standard function body
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGJVjEccyThK=5-n+F=2NtpYQwVpyi3GLNFqFxjjDwyXCQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to SQL-standard function body  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: SQL-standard function body  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 5:49 AM Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> - More test coverage is needed.  Surprisingly, there wasn't actually any
> test AFAICT that just creates and SQL function and runs it.  Most of
> that code is tested incidentally, but there is very little or no
> targeted testing of this functionality.

FYI cfbot showed a sign of some kind of error_context_stack corruption
while running "DROP TABLE functest3 CASCADE;".



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Log the location field before any backtrace