Re: Do we expect tests to work with default_transaction_isolation=serializable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Do we expect tests to work with default_transaction_isolation=serializable
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGJL_rN_M0nGur4gSkBz+Xy+y6Ps=LujWFSw-4MMraS6jQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Do we expect tests to work withdefault_transaction_isolation=serializable  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:55 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I seem to recall that we expect tests to either work with
> default_transaction_isolation=serializable, or to set it to a different
> level where needed.

Here are a couple of bits where that is no longer necessary after bb16aba5.

-- 
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: behaviour change - default_tablesapce + partition table
Next
From: Rushabh Lathia
Date:
Subject: Re: behaviour change - default_tablesapce + partition table