Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGJK24Q0zOH4Z5X++jin6J5ZckLtpXksxE5Sj7F7A83LDA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:34 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
> Even if that's just me being delusional, I'd still prefer Alvaro's
> approach to have distinct switches for each collation system.

Hi Julien,

Makes sense.  But why use the name "glibc" in the code and user
interface?  The name of the collation provider in PostgreSQL is "libc"
(for example in the CREATE COLLATION command), and the problem applies
no matter who makes your libc.

-- 
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb