Re: LLVM 22 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: LLVM 22
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGJFVyQA8QOjB3BSuq9N1VbTvMPzsFG93p=4TmLR8R58zA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: LLVM 22  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: LLVM 22
Re: LLVM 22
Re: LLVM 22
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 4:25 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> Working on this, more shortly...  I'm trying to figure out if Anthonin
> and Andres's feedback means the poison approach does nothing useful
> and we might as well just #ifdef out the lifetime.end stuff for LLVM
> >= 22 to fix the breakage today.

Done.  Hopefully midge and Devrim will now turn green :-)

> Either way it looks like we need a patch to use alloca instead, which
> I'll also look into...

I see a few options, but I need to hack on them for a while to figure
out the tradeoffs, or what I'm missing...  after the freeze.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Redundant/mis-use of _(x) gettext macro?
Next
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Termination of Background Workers for ALTER/DROP DATABASE