Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGJAYsxAkh48N2+VC1djaATqWna=ERouiLtXqdj6Er7Cmg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?  (Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?  (Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 1:01 AM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have rebased the patch to master (1e2fddfa33d3c7cc93ca3ee0f32852699bd3e012) and fixed some compilation warning. Now
Iam reviewing the actual code.
 

Thanks for doing that Ibrar.  I think the right status for this CF
entry is now:  Needs review.  I have set it that way, in the September
CF.   By the way, there are some test failures:

https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.50280

-- 
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoid full GIN index scan when possible
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: How to retain lesser paths at add_path()?