Re: pg_waldump: support decoding of WAL inside tarfile - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: pg_waldump: support decoding of WAL inside tarfile
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGJ4JcGNWV0KHD5iChGhJ5Z1F8RXSdxnt2yOoW+KHJuLaQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: pg_waldump: support decoding of WAL inside tarfile  (Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_waldump: support decoding of WAL inside tarfile
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Apr 4, 2026 at 4:30 AM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2026 at 17:59, Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2026 at 12:38 AM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I also tried Thomas'
> > > > "v2-0001-Improve-tar-portability-logic-from-ebba64c0" [3] but it
> > > > didn't fix the problem on OpenBSD [4].
> > >
> > > Apparently it wants -F ustar, like this.  Funny that it passed on the
> > > build farm animals though.  Oh, it looks like they changed the default
> > > fairly recently.
> >
> > LGTM with just a correction of my earlier comment.
>
> Thanks for the patches! I confirm that both v3 and v4 fix the problem
> for OpenBSD CI.

Pushed, after testing on an OpenBSD VM and making some corrections:

* I'd screwed up the test command line in a way that worked by coincidence
** OpenBSD tar writes to a tape device by default, so use -f /dev/null
** I'd forgotten == 0, so the result was inverted, hiding that screwup
* -f /dev/null is a better form for all of them because the default
destination is a build option
* needed elsif instead of if, or BSD tar finished up getting both
--format=ustar and -F ustar
* ran perltidy, keeping only the hunks due to this patch

CI passes and shows "212 subtests passed" for all five Unixen +
Windows/mingw, but only "156 subtests passed" for Windows/MSVC.
.cirrus.tasks.yml appears to use the same $TAR for both, namely the
system tar, so I think we can say that *this* thing is working, but
something else might be wrong with our scripting glue somewhere?

The other OSes on our list are AIX and Solaris.  From a quick look at
their manuals, I don't foresee issues with pax or large UIDs.

Hopefully that covers everything!



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Better shared data structure management and resizable shared data structures
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: POC: Parallel processing of indexes in autovacuum