Re: Syncing pg_multixact directories - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Syncing pg_multixact directories
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+yiFn9fH5g+P5kJ8QTa1ScUnC0iRb3eP_W2p3DAdVBOw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Syncing pg_multixact directories  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Syncing pg_multixact directories  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 4:09 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 07:05:36PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2020-09-23 13:45:51 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> >> I think we should be ensuring that directory entries for newly created
> >> multixact files are durable at checkpoint time.  Please see attached.
> >
> > Good catch! Probably that should probably be backpatched...
>
> +1.  Passing that down to the SLRU layer is a nice thing to do.  Were
> you planning to send a second patch here?  The commit log generated
> mentions patch 1/2.

Oh, that's just because I also have another patch, for master only, to
go on top, but that's in another thread about SLRU fsync offloading.
Sorry for the confusion.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Syncing pg_multixact directories
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Removing unneeded self joins