Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB files
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+jOK-0ZbCAiTwPx8_ajfRs9cAgkFf4BodfQiE9G+3n1w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB files  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB files
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 2:16 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> PS: For illustration/discussion, I've also attached a "none" patch.  I
> also couldn't resist rebasing my "wal" mode patch, which I plan to
> propose for PG15 because there is not enough time left for this
> release.

Erm... I attached the wrong version by mistake.  Here's a better one.
(Note: I'm not expecting any review of the 0003 patch in this CF, I
just wanted to share the future direction I'd like to consider for
this problem.)

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies