Re: pgsql: Fix potential stack overflow in incremental backup. - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: pgsql: Fix potential stack overflow in incremental backup.
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+ge+bZjvJmVYkepCEO-bBeZTe7HmoWpByD2oY-3hL6nw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Fix potential stack overflow in incremental backup.  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-committers
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 2:28 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> + * file just as if this were not an incremental backup.  The contents of the
> + * relative_block_numbers array is unspecified in this case.
>
> Perhaps you mean s/is/are/ here?  The contents are what's not
> specified.

Thanks, fixed.  Duh.



pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Fix grammar.
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix race leading to incorrect conflict cause in InvalidatePossib