On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 6:33 PM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> here is an rebase of Thomas's implementation
Thanks. I finished up not committing that one for 14 because I wasn't
sure about the way to rebase it on top of 3a513067 (now reverted);
that "restore" stuff seemed a bit weird. Let's try again in v15 CF1!