Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+aGHzgE4-FftnQmpkQ7719yrY3qj5M3y-ieMxYq8+q1w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 2:57 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 02:08:32PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > After 495ed0e, do these references to Windows SDK 8.1 still make sense?

> As listed on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows_SDK,
> likely not.  What do you think about the attached?

LGTM.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Overhauling "Routine Vacuuming" docs, particularly its handling of freezing
Next
From: Kirk Wolak
Date:
Subject: PSQL Should \sv & \ev work with materialized views?