On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 2:57 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 02:08:32PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > After 495ed0e, do these references to Windows SDK 8.1 still make sense?
> As listed on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows_SDK,
> likely not. What do you think about the attached?
LGTM.