Re: Automatically sizing the IO worker pool - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Automatically sizing the IO worker pool
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+WZfFjwE-nDpKbzq=M37GntjcqvKdzV+dLkDgXEWppdg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Automatically sizing the IO worker pool  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 8, 2026 at 2:09 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Seems like there should be two fields. One saying "notify postmaster again"
> > and one "postmaster start a worker".  The former would only be cleared by
> > postmaster after the timeout.
>
> Good idea.  V7 has two tweaks:
>
> * separate grow and grow_signal_sent flags, as you suggested
> * it also applies the io_worker_launch_delay to cancelled grow requests

Oh, but that logic should of course be moved below the "time in the
past" check.  Will do...



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Automatically sizing the IO worker pool
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Our ABI diff infrastructure ignores enum SysCacheIdentifier