Re: SegFault on 9.6.14 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: SegFault on 9.6.14
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+A4TWxt8g5K5fOunUVQ1jtd3EWco=GoR=funG1UfaeBQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SegFault on 9.6.14  (Jerry Sievers <gsievers19@comcast.net>)
Responses Re: SegFault on 9.6.14
Re: SegFault on 9.6.14
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 12:26 PM Jerry Sievers <gsievers19@comcast.net> wrote:
> Is this the right sequencing?
>
> 1. Start client and get backend pid
> 2. GDB;  handle SIGUSR1, break, cont
> 3. Run query
> 4. bt

Perfect, thanks.  I think I just spotted something:

> #11 0x000055666e0359df in ExecShutdownNode (node=node@entry=0x55667033a6c8)
>     at /build/postgresql-9.6-5O8OLM/postgresql-9.6-9.6.14/build/../src/backend/executor/execProcnode.c:830
> #12 0x000055666e04d0ff in ExecLimit (node=node@entry=0x55667033a428)
>     at /build/postgresql-9.6-5O8OLM/postgresql-9.6-9.6.14/build/../src/backend/executor/nodeLimit.c:139

https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/REL9_6_STABLE/src/backend/executor/nodeLimit.c#L139

Limit thinks it's OK to "shut down" the subtree, but if you shut down a
Gather node you can't rescan it later because it destroys its shared
memory.  Oops.  Not sure what to do about that yet.


--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jerry Sievers
Date:
Subject: Re: SegFault on 9.6.14
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: SegFault on 9.6.14