Re: v17 vs v16 performance comparison - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: v17 vs v16 performance comparison
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+0Sg=k=r3aCNFFF9tit+Pax+NQyPJ75uSwtK57J=Zkag@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to v17 vs v16 performance comparison  (Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: v17 vs v16 performance comparison
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 3:00 PM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> wrote:
> So it looks like q15 from TPC-DS is not the only query suffering from that
> change.

I'm going to try to set up a local repro to study these new cases.  If
you have a write-up somewhere of how exactly you run that, that'd be
useful.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
Next
From: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication