Re: parallel vacuum options/syntax - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: parallel vacuum options/syntax
Date
Msg-id CA+fd4k6zVJa6t_3m2cX9+=KEaRHrx2wE0_LVtbK4TfU8AKodkQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: parallel vacuum options/syntax  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 15:31, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 11:31 AM Masahiko Sawada
> <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 15:27, Masahiko Sawada
> > <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I just felt it's not intuitive that specifying parallel degree to 0
> > > means to disable parallel vacuum. But since majority of hackers seem
> > > to agree with this syntax I'm not going to insist on that any further.
> > >
> >
> > Okay I'm going to go with enabling parallel vacuum by default and
> > disabling it by specifying PARALLEL 0.
> >
>
> Sounds fine to me.  However, I have already started updating the patch
> for that.  I shall post the new version today or tomorrow.  Is that
> fine with you?

Yes, that's fine. Thanks.

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada            http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_shmem_allocations view
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions