Re: GIN Trigram Index Size - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Francisco Olarte
Subject Re: GIN Trigram Index Size
Date
Msg-id CA+bJJbyMbn_z_Xnn6VCphJ6mc1yft=dbXfq8JDaVTgwYm+ALqQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to GIN Trigram Index Size  (Christian Ramseyer <rc@networkz.ch>)
List pgsql-general
Hi Christian:

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Christian Ramseyer <rc@networkz.ch> wrote:
> I agree with your append-only and disposable partition approach, it
> would work a lot better. The idea with using a second schema for
> selective backups is great, I'll totally steal this :)

Feel free. Just remember if you use redirection trigers/rules for
insert into the partitions it may lead to problems ( I do not normally
have them as I either use a partition aware dedicated inserter or zap
the archived tables from rules, as I only insert for the current date,
maintenance updates are done directly in the partitions ).



Francisco Olarte.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jan de Visser
Date:
Subject: Re: Ubuntu installed postgresql password failure
Next
From: Ingmar Brouns
Date:
Subject: issue, dumping and restoring tables with table inheritance can alter column order