On 23 October 2014 15:39, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, I'm going around in the circle. But I'd like to say again, I don't think
> this is good idea. It prevents asynchronous pg_receivexlog from fsyncing
> WAL data and sending feedbacks more frequently at all. They are useful,
> for example, when we want to monitor the write location of asynchronous
> pg_receivexlog in almost realtime. But if we adopt the idea, since feedback
> cannot be sent soon in async mode, pg_stat_replication always returns
> the not-up-to-date location.
Why not send a message every 10 seconds when its not sync rep?
-- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
