Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMLgvfbTQWSCpnV4-oxqVeQm+U6BO4nQN=hxqPGaYeBo4Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul
List pgsql-hackers
On 23 January 2013 04:49, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:

> - recovery.conf is removed (no backward compatibility in this version of the
> patch)

If you want to pursue that, you know where it leads. No, rebasing a
rejected patch doesn't help, its just relighting a fire that shouldn't
ever have been lit.

Pushing to do that out of order is just going to drain essential time
out of this CF from all of us.

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeevan Chalke
Date:
Subject: Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST
Next
From: Hari Babu
Date:
Subject: pg_basebackup with -R option and start standby have problems with escaped password