Re: WAL Rate Limiting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: WAL Rate Limiting
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMLL4pqGE5zxB=BkzaA1OtWVCwfAf4AQ5u6C1AWHPTVY+g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL Rate Limiting  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 16 January 2014 17:49, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> Agreed, but it won't happen in this release. I/O resource control to
>> follow in later releases.
>
> "This release"?  TBH, I think this patch has arrived too late to be
> considered for 9.4.  It's a fairly major feature and clearly not
> without controversy, so I don't think that posting it for the first
> time the day before CF4 starts meets the guidelines we all agreed
> to back in Ottawa.

I think its majorly useful, but there really isn't much to the
implementation and I expect its beneath the level of being defined as
a major feature. (I think it may have taken less time to write than
this current conversation has lasted).

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Steeve Lennmark
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Relocation of tablespaces in pg_basebackup
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup