Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Reply-To: - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Reply-To:
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nML03+vA_c5OucqFLCGjJeWK_5dqrobfRQZ-GgDAXxH9ZQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Reply-To:  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 18 March 2014 21:21, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:39:03AM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On 8 March 2014 11:14, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> > Implemented in attached patch, v22
>
>> > I commend this patch to you for final review; I would like to commit
>> > this in a few days.
>>
>> I'm planning to commit this today at 1500UTC barring objections or
>> negative reviews.
>
> Not an objection, but FYI, I'm currently in the midst of reviewing this.

Thanks, I'll holdoff until I hear from you.

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Review: plpgsql.extra_warnings, plpgsql.extra_errors
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: plpgsql.extra_warnings, plpgsql.extra_errors