Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMKwC=tWcWmbpujaNSO4HSPnG-xTDmbrvbBRTWwvBtFd3A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
List pgsql-hackers
On 27 October 2014 20:24, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
>>> I think by far the biggest problem here is the
>>> lack of attention to the design from others.
>>
>> I find that attitude incredible.
>
> What I mean is that that's the thing that clearly needs scrutiny the
> most. That isn't an attitude - it's a technical opinion.

Let's see if we can link these two thoughts.

1. You think the biggest problem is the lack of attention to the design.

2. I keep asking you to put the docs in a readable form.

If you can't understand the link between those two things, I am at a loss.

Good luck with the patch.

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: CREATE DATABASE vs. (partial) CHECKPOINT
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Directory/File Access Permissions for COPY and Generic File Access Functions