Re: Is anybody actually using XLR_BKP_REMOVABLE? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Is anybody actually using XLR_BKP_REMOVABLE?
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMKsjrkC1ezSh5sva-onQmqJ4bQ0sUAU3PrYQbCq-Coiug@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Is anybody actually using XLR_BKP_REMOVABLE?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Is anybody actually using XLR_BKP_REMOVABLE?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Furthermore, what the XLR_BKP_REMOVABLE bit actually reports is just
> whether a backup operation is in progress, and I think we have now (or
> easily could) add reporting records to the WAL stream that tell when a
> backup starts or stops.  So external compression would still be possible
> if it kept a bit more state around.
>
> So: is there actually any such compression program out there?
> Would anybody really cry if this flag went away?

Yes, WAL records could be invented to mark the boundaries, so yes,
IMHO it is OK to make that flag go away.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lars Kanis
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Is anybody actually using XLR_BKP_REMOVABLE?