Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMKQH4os5SJZ3DcnNVgS-nREt_Gb0+TfCfbMLruH_0Smpw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> It wouldn't, although it might be bad in the case where there are lots
> of temp tables being created and dropped.

Do temp tables cause relcache invalidations?

That seems like something we'd want to change in itself.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful
Next
From: Yeb Havinga
Date:
Subject: Pull up aggregate sublink (was: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery))