Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMKPJMsx0ProWMP=_ZF4YHCPf8Z6NrViGD5TnChtc3UXyw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer  ("Dickson S. Guedes" <listas@guedesoft.net>)
Responses Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Dickson S. Guedes <listas@guedesoft.net> wrote:

> I'm trying your patch, it was applied cleanly to master and compiled
> ok. But since I started postgres I'm seeing a  99% of CPU usage:

Oh, thanks. I see what happened. I was toying with the idea of going
straight to a WaitLatch implementation for the loop but decided to
leave it out for a later patch, and then skipped the sleep as well.

New version attached.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: bug of recovery?
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: bug of recovery?