Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMKJsvWst3cxGsK5n6YTEFrzNRczG8U_AXdgabZDpoUTdQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 21 June 2012 01:40, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

>> I think extraction is a very sensible place to start; actually, I
>> think it's the best possible place to start.  But this particular
>> thread is about adding origin_ids to WAL, which I think is definitely
>> not the best place to start.

> Yep. I think the reason everyone started at it is that the patch was actually
> really simple ;).
> Note that the wal enrichement & decoding patches were before the origin_id
> patch in the patchseries ;)

Actually, I thought it would be non contentious...

A format change, so early in release cycle. Already openly discussed
with no comment. Using wasted space for efficiency, for information
already in use by Slony for similar reasons.

Oh well.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node