Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMKEh4ZmNf+juynz22XjDDi_C33Es+H4iMRV=bpjQT_VBw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:

>> What happens if we shutdown the WALwriter and then issue SIGHUP?
>
> SIGHUP doesn't affect full_page_writes in that case. Oh, you are concerned about
> the case where smart shutdown kills walwriter but some backends are
> still running?
> Currently SIGHUP affects full_page_writes and running backends use the changed
> new value of full_page_writes. But in the patch, SIGHUP doesn't affect...
>
> To address the problem, we should either postpone the shutdown of walwriter
> until all backends have gone away, or leave the update of full_page_writes to
> checkpointer process instead of walwriter. Thought?

checkpointer seems the correct place to me

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
Next
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: PgNext: CFP