On 3 March 2013 18:24, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> The 16-bit checksum feature seems functional, with two sources of overhead.
> There's some CPU time burned to compute checksums when pages enter the
> system. And there's extra overhead for WAL logging hint bits. I'll
> quantify both of those better in another message.
It's crunch time. Do you and Jeff believe this patch should be
committed to Postgres core?
Are there objectors?
-- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
