Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMK8wxrBrVUGBTcBZQ-G_k09PbuE7-Vz6B+u42KAu32DYQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)  (Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
List pgsql-hackers
On 16 January 2013 08:21, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> At 2013-01-16 02:07:29 -0500, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
>>
>> In case you hadn't noticed, we've totally lost control of
>> the CF process.
>
> What can we do to get it back on track?

"Totally lost control" is an overstatement. The current situation is
that there are clearly more patches than people working on them; a
situation that we've been in, with various degrees for all of the last
9 years of my involvement with PostgreSQL.

AFAIK there was no CF manager assigned to Nov2012 CF, so not
surprising it is off track. Not sure we ever agreed a process for
assigning CF mgrs, so again, not surprising it is off track.

I would like to nominate Craig Ringer to be independent CF mgr for Jan2013 CF.

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Curious buildfarm failures (fwd)