Re: basic pgbench runs with various performance-related patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: basic pgbench runs with various performance-related patches
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMJdmWDB9UapWU5hvQUtHxsHZLA3f+k86VYHUaGZ8B-zVg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: basic pgbench runs with various performance-related patches  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: basic pgbench runs with various performance-related patches  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

>> The other patches have clearer and specific roles without heuristics
>> (mostly), so are at least viable for 9.2, though still requiring
>> agreement.
>
> I think we must also drop removebufmgrfreelist-v1 from consideration,
...

I think you misidentify the patch. Earlier you said it that
"buffreelistlock-reduction-v1 crapped
out"  and I already said that the assumption in the code clearly
doesn't hold, implying the patch was dropped.

The removebufmgrfreelist and its alternate patch is still valid, with
applicability to special cases.

I've written another patch to assist with testing/assessment of the
problems, attached.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Measuring relation free space
Next
From: Daniel Farina
Date:
Subject: Re: Inline Extension